Flan O’Brien, *The Third Policeman* p47

Flan O’Brien, *The Third Policeman* p47

Tags: flan o'brien

Alan Furst,*Night Soldiers* p139

Alan Furst,*Night Soldiers* p139

Alan Furst, *The World at Night*, p103

Alan Furst, *The World at Night*, p103

Tags: alan furst

Alan Furst, *The World at Night* p9

Alan Furst, *The World at Night* p9

Jonathan Lethem, “Nine Failures of the Imagination”, *The Ecstasy of Influence* p221

Jonathan Lethem, “Nine Failures of the Imagination”, *The Ecstasy of Influence* p221

*The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract*, LF#90, Charlie Jamieson

*The New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract*, LF#90, Charlie Jamieson

Tags: bill james

Excerpt from my essay, “The Various Shit, Internetual or Otherwise, I Have Been Reading &/or Thinking about Lately”:

5. It has become axiomatic, in this post-post-(post)-modernist age, that identity is composed and not innate and so on and so forth. I find this to be immensely troubling and ultimately kind of preposterous. It seems to me to be a kind of existential overreaction to the terrors of fascism & colonialism: because for so long the powerful presumed there was an innate quality in being white & Xian that gave them the right to do whatever they wanted to those who were not white &/or Xian, a lot of thinkers freaked out and decided that there was nothing innate about people at all and that the very concept of innateness was dangerous. And that’s understandable, because racialism or whatever you want to call it is a ridiculous and provably false set of ideas; equally, however, it is provably false that identity consists only of inputs. There is a unique processor somewhere in a human brain that causes similar inputs to output different people; it’s not that this is totally immutable or intractable — I am in a lather to assure you that I do not believe in the concept of a soul — but that there is a core to any person’s being that will cause them to compose themselves in a certain way, which has very little to do with culture or language. The British neuroscientist and philosopher Raymond Tallis writes in his crushing review of Jacques Lacan & co: a History of Psychoanalysis in France:

Future historians trying to account for the institutionalised fraud that goes under the name of ‘Theory’ will surely accord a central place to the influence of the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. He is one of the fattest spiders at the heart of the web of muddled not-quite-thinkable-thoughts and evidence-free assertions of limitless scope which practitioners of theorrhoea have woven into their version of the humanities. Much of the dogma central to contemporary Theory came from him: that the signifier dominates over the signified; that the world of words creates the world of things; that the ‘I’ is a fiction based upon an Oedipalised negotiation of the transition from mirror to symbolic stages; and so on.

This.

David Mitchell, *Black Swan Green* p152

David Mitchell, *Black Swan Green* p152

David Mitchell, *Black Swan Green* p130

David Mitchell, *Black Swan Green* p130

Principles of Fiction #6

It is a principle of fiction that one should be suspicious of the conspicuously beautiful.